********************************************************************

 

Maliyat journal (Iranian Tax Review)

No. 45, summer 2006

 

 

 

 

 

IN THE NAME OF ALLAH

 

FROM THE PRESIDENT

 

Growth of Investment and expansion of economic activities are the necessary factors for achievement of development and welfare in a society. For many, attainment of that purpose requires the establishment of economic security and protection of investment, which they consider a must and prerequisite in this regard.

That is a fact that nobody would deny. For instance, we can find among the general policies laid down for the fourth development plan, the paragraph 45 which refers to the "stabilization of a secure atmosphere for economic activities and investments" as a recognized policy. but it should not be forgotten that by granting rights and privileges, the society would follow the achievement of some higher goals and aims. That is why the second paragraph of general policies approved concerning the security of investment, states that the purpose of such security is to enhance general welfare and economic boom and also establishment of economic justice and removal of poverty.

The logic and good sense would also require that abidance by duties be expected from those to whom the rights are granted. In today's world, especially in the countries with most liberal and free economies, the respect and diligence towards the economic security is always accompanied by due observance and enforcement of certain principles as well. Among them, the most important one is the principle of transparency that must be adhered to in all aspects of economic and financial activities. This is an axiom through which the society may guarantee its rights in a suitable manner.

In other words, the case is not solely removal of obstacles from the way of investors, so that they could follow their material interests without acknowledging reciprocal duties for themselves. To provide security for investment and economic activities is only one side of the issue that should obviously be realized. But as we narrated above from the approved general principles, the society would also follow its own objectives, namely the public welfare, economic boom, justice and removal of poverty.

How the latter aims can be achieved? One important, or may be most significant, condition is the existence of economic transparency, which has been recognized as such everywhere. No need to say that transparency is a prerequisite for prevention of many unlawful actions and violations as well.

Transparency becomes much more vital when taxation aspect of the issue is at stake, since it is the very taxation that affords possibility for attainment of purposes such as the public welfare, social justice, removal of poverty, and even improvement of a country's economy.

What we said above does not obviously mean that the expansion of economic activities and growth of investment would not constitute by itself, and notwithstanding the taxation aspect of the issue, an important factor for creation of business boom, jobs, welfare and the like. But the taxation side of any matter is more pertaining to the work of this magazine that is wholly dedicated to tax studies. Beside that, the effects of economic transparency are apt to be manifested in the realm of taxation more than any other domain.

Justice and social considerations would also require the enforcement of economic transparency. To realize security for business activities, the society has to remove all kinds of unnecessary obstacles from the way of Investment and exploitation of it. But nobody can deny that the said activities must be performed in a sound and healthy manner, while the requirements of law are safely observed. These considerations may not be realized in an atmosphere that lucks the requisites of transparency. Transparency would cause the tax laws and regulations to be executed more easily and by better access to reliable information. Under such conditions, the investors and businesses may earn lawful profits, the society would take benefit from blessings of healthy economic activities, and necessary sources will also be secured for the treasury to be consumed for well being and progress of the country.

The domain and manner of application of transparency should obviously be defined and clarified. Considerable progress in this regard has been achieved in the world. Even opening of a bank account and transfer of money to it require the observance of certain degrees of transparency. Extensive studies are to be undertaken, not only in respect of the current circumstances and prevailing conditions of the internal economy, but also with regard to what is going on in the outer world, especially in developed countries for realization of financial and economic transparency. Based on such studies, reasonable and viable criteria can be codified and executed.

As regards the taxation, existing internal laws have dealt with some aspects of the issue. Further studies and endeavors are surely necessary to improve the situation and raise our regulations to a level compatible with requirements of transparency in its modern sense.

Beside that, enough will and support are also indispensable. In that case, the tax transparency would serve as a powerful tool for securing more financial revenues and thus reducing the reliance of country's budget on oil revenue. It would also facilitate the economic transparency in general, an objective to which, as we mentioned earlier, special attention is paid by the people and high leadership of the country.

 

Dr. Aliakbar Arabmazar

 

***********************

 

 

Tax Regulations of the Budget Law

 

By: Dr. Mohammad Tavakkol

 

The budget of the current year (Iranian solar year 1386 beginning from 21 March 2007) amounts to a sum of 2.317 quadrillion Rials. As usual, the budget is divided to two separate parts. The first part relates to the government in its proper sense, namely organizations such as ministries, state institutions and the like. While the second part of the budget covers the public companies including banks. This latter section absorbs nearly 72.4% of total amount of the budget and the remaining portion of 27.6% is allocated to government ministries and organizations. Of course the figure mentioned in the budget for government ministries, etc. (692 trillion Rials) comes to a share of the total budget slightly more than the said percentage of 27.6%. The reason is that a part of that amount (equal to 52 trillion Rials) is to be spent for offsetting the losses envisaged for state-owned corporations. By subtracting that figure, the net budget of government agencies, etc. will amount to 640 trillion Rials, which is exactly 27.6% of total budget.

After that brief presentation of budget figures let us turn to the principal theme of this article, namely the tax regulations of the budget. Before dealing with monetary figures, the budget law first introduces several legal provisions whose validity duration is limited to the budget year. Each of these separate regulations is called a "tabsareh", which we would translate to "Note" in this writing. Notes are mostly divided to sections, subsections and the like. Meanwhile, the subjects dealt with by the Notes pertain to different matters. Therefore, our discussion will be confined to few Notes that refer to tax issues and will leave the non-tax regulations.

 

Section "B" of the Note 1

This section relates to the corporate tax of state-owned companies whose business is supposed to produce profits and therefore certain amounts of taxes are envisaged for them. As regards the operations of public oil companies and enterprises, a separate figure is forecast as the income tax applicable to this type of activities of those companies. The relevant item is entitled as the "tax on oil turnover" and inserted as a separate figure in the budget.

Those tax items (corporate tax of state-owned oil companies and the tax on oil turnover) add up to 4525.5 billion Iranian Rials. Now the section "B" of the Note 1 of the budget law states that that amount of taxation is to be paid to the tax organization in twelve monthly installments during the budget year. This means obviously the prepayment of the tax, since otherwise the applicable tax had to be paid after expiration of taxable year and also after examination of tax returns.

The same profitable public corporations have also been required (under the section "C" of the Note 1) to pay not less than 40% of the net profit that they will declare in respect of their previous year operations. This amount will be considered as dividend of those corporations.

 

Section "D" of the Note 1

This section relates to the rate of tax on gasoline, which is determined, the same as in the previous year. Twenty per cent of the sale price of gasoline will be collected as tax and another ten per cent as excise duty.

 

Section "F" of the Note 1

As in the previous year, small businesses are exempted from a proviso of the article 101 of the Direct Taxes Act. According to the said article taking benefit from the threshold provided for businesses under the tax law, would depend on submission of tax return in due time. The budget law states that such restricting proviso will not be observed in respect of small businesses during the budget year.   

 

Section "E" of the Note 4

Note 4 of the budget law provides for a series of measures and policies with the aim of securing the development of non-state sectors of the economy. One of such measures is referred to under the section "E" of the Note 4 which reads:

"The on-account tax mentioned in the part "A" of the article 8 of the law on fourth development plan shall be considered final and no other payments will be demanded as the income tax on transfer of shares and priority rights of shares during the year 1386"

The article 8 of the law on fourth development plan referred to above provides that the receipts from sale of shares of state companies shall be deposited with the General Treasury and will be allocated to several purposes. A portion equal to 20% of such receipts is envisaged (under the paragraph "A" of the said article 8) to be allocated to a special account as on-account payment of the tax on the operations of relevant holding companies and their associated corporations. Now the section "E" of the Note 4 of the budget law states that though the fourth development law has considered the said 20% as on-account payment of taxation, but for the budget year the same will be accepted as final amount of tax and no other payments will be claimed as the tax on transfer of comapanies' stocks under the art 143 of the Direct Taxes Act.

 

Section "D" of the Note 6

Dozens of measures and policies are laid down by the Note 6 of the budget law for improvement of housing situation in the country. Two of these directives involve tax regulations, both of which are presented through the section "D" of that Note. They are as follows:

1. The government is authorized to subsidize the housing projects that are undertaken by private constructors. The subsidy will be given in respect of the interest on bank loans that the constructors will receive to fund their projects. Payment of subsidies is conditioned on a number of stipulations that are enumerated in the same Note. In case all conditions are met, the first transfer of constructed housing units will be exempt from payment of the tax on transfer of immovable properties (first paragraph of the section "E" of the Note 6).

A similar rule is provided under the sixth paragraph of the same section "E" of the Note 6. The private companies and institutions that embark on mass production of houses by using new technology and observing certain other conditions and criteria, will take benefit from a number of supports, including tax abatement. First transfer of houses built within the housing complexes according to certain patterns and by observance of the aforesaid conditions, will be exempt from the tax on transfer of immovable properties.

 

Section "C" of the Note 11

The energy and its relevant problems and issues are subject matters of the Note 11 of the budget law.  The following parts of the section "C" of that Note relate to our discussion:

 1. The paragraph one of the section "C" of the Note 11 states that 5% of sale price of the crude oil produced in the country will be designated as the tax on oil turnover and will be recorded as such in the books of the Oil Ministry and its relevant affiliated companies.

But the tax so computed is an on-account figure and the final amount will be determined after examination of returns and accounts on basis of ordinary procedure of such examination. The same section "E" of the Note 11 of the budget law refers (in paragraph 4) to that point and states that if the ordinary examination under the provisions of the tax law would show a higher result as the tax applicable to oil operations, then the same higher amount will be applied. The text of the budget is composed in a way that one may deduce that the same rule will not apply if examination would reveal lower result, namely a lesser amount of applicable tax.

Beside the tax described above, an amount equal to 4.5% of the same selling price of crude oil is to be designated as dividend payable to the government who is direct or indirect owner of those public companies.

2. Paragraph 11, section "E" of the Note 11 is of special importance and deserves a separate examination. First let us give a translation of some points of its text:

"As far as the payment of dividends and different kinds of taxes are concerned, the financial and legal relations between the government (ministries and state institutions) and the Oil Ministry, which operates through its affiliated companies, will be governed exclusively by the rules of this section and other regulations provided under the Notes of this law [budget law], the Direct Taxes Act of 1366 [1988] and its further amendments, and also the law of 1381 [2002] concerning the imposition of duties and other payments on production of goods and provision of services …"

That ruling is of special significance, since it aims at bringing the taxation aspects of the oil trade and oil industry within the general stream of tax law and tax procedures. Nevertheless, the same part of the budget introduces later the following sentences:

"The by–law for execution of this section and the mechanism for settlement of accounts between the General Treasury and the Oil Ministry, which operates through its affiliated companies, shall be approved by the Council of Ministers on basis of a proposal to be submitted jointly by the Oil Ministry, the Ministry of Economic Affairs and Finance, Plan and Management Organization and the Central Bank…"

So, one may infer that the accomplishment of regulations described above (regarding taxation of public oil companies) would depend on preparation and approval of the latter by-law.

 

Note 13

Note 13 of the budget law relates to transportation issues on the one hand and environmental policies on the other hand. A series of measures are predicted for protection of the environment, among which the green taxes are very rare and negligible. More exactly speaking, the only measure envisaged in this respect is a duty that will be charged at time of numbering the cars and giving them number plate for the first time. That duty is to be determined on basis of some factors among which the degree of pollution any car may create and also the level of their consumption of fuel can be attributed to environmental considerations. Altogether, little attention is paid in this country to environmental taxes, while the harmful effects of pollution is felt, at least in majority of big cities.

 

 

****************************

 

 

Working hours of banks

 

An excuse for presentation of a novel tax that was frustrated

 

By: M. T. Hamadani

 

The story of working hours of banks is well known to everybody in this country. Our discussion does not pertain to the story itself, but relates to the idea of laying down a new tax that was proposed during the parliamentary debates on that subject.

As it can be understood from the parliamentary deb ates of January 3, 2007 (Official Gazette No 18035, dated 24 Jan. 2007), the parliament had previously approved a draft in which the banks had been required to start their daily work at a certain hour of the morning. But the Guardian Council of the Constitution found the draft to be contrary to the Constitution, since according to the Council it gave rise to interference of the legislature with the work of the executive. Therefore the draft came back to the parliament for reconsideration, and the parliament dealt with it at the aforesaid session.

Four proposals were submitted by the members of the parliament for redrafting the law. The first one was taken back by those presenting it. From the remaining proposals, one pertains to our discussion; therefore we deal with the same first, and then will give a summary account of the two others at the end of this writing.

The MP who put forward the proposal (Mr. Mohammad Mahdi Mofatteh) while trying to remove the point of objection of the Guardian Council, introduced a new, better to say a novel, taxation idea for understanding of which let us narrate the very wording of his suggestion:

"To determine the working hours of all companies and economic institutions, including the banks, is a right of those legal entities that will be decided by their boards of directors. But if the activities of those institutions in some hours of day or night would entail social costs (like traffic problems, air pollution and other social coasts), then the government may submit to the Islamic Consultative Assembly [Parliament] a draft of law for compensation of the same by introduction of a special tax"

So, the proposal had two parts, both of which can be considered initiative and novel, at least so far as this country is concerned. The first part concerned the assignment to all enterprises (including banks) the right of fixing their own working hours, and the second, possibility of taxing the same enterprises for compensation of social costs that their decision may entail. As regards the first part of the proposal, it is better to see what the proposing MP had himself said for justification of his view:

"The proposal I submitted for removal of the Guardian Council's objection provides for the idea that the right of deciding upon the working hours of companies belongs to themselves. Any economic institution has, from the beginning of its activity, a series of rights including the right of determining its own working hours. The same is true in respect of banks. Presently an atmosphere of competition governs the working of banks, which is quite good and admirable. Then no problem if the same competition would extend to their working hours, so that more convenience is provided to the people. Let each bank be free to allocate more working hours for giving services to its clients and the people avail themselves of those services more conveniently and during a longer time"

Even in case of government banks and companies the same reasoning is considered to be right. Though the government may, as owner of those institutions, take any decision regarding their working hours, but it also will be required to have in mind its economic interest, since in such an atmosphere it would face with the private sector's competition.

 

Taxation issue

Our discussion relates especially to the taxation aspect of the proposed draft of law. The logic behind this part of the proposal is quite understandable under the prevailing circumstances of today's world. As a witness we may refer to the example of China. This country has had an astonishing rate of growth during the recent years. But the same phenomenon created such environmental difficulties that are going to change the sweetness of progress to bitterness and tragedy for the people.

Problems encountered by inhabitants of our own capital city can be referred to as another example. Daily transportation of millions of people would facilitate the economic activities. But the social costs and problems created by the same process (air pollution and traffic jam in particular) are also well known to every body.

Now the question is how the negative aspects of the issue can be dealt with. Different solutions may be searched for and found. But beside that, a fact is clear and is to be adhered to. Those who create problems must accept a share for compensation of it. The Iranian civil law has also provided for a similar rule. Causation is the title used by the law in this respect. Anybody causing damage, even if unintentionally, should indemnify for the losses so incurred (Civil Code, Article 331).

By referring to the civil law we would not obviously mean that the indemnification of social costs caused by economic activities must be sought under the regulations of the said law. The purpose is to point out that idea of compensation of damages is well rooted in recognized legal rules of all nations. That being the case, much more significance is to be attached to indemnification of great and tragic losses caused by pollution and similar factors. The thought of confrontation with effects of pollution and similar calamities is properly established in many countries. Among the instruments resorted to for such confrontation, taxes play an important role.

The very thought of changing the bank's working hours was raised as a measure to alleviate the problems of traffic and air pollution. Of course both problems have gone so far that measures of this type may not improve the situation. While imposition of a percentage of damages on those who have caused it not only seems to be logical and justified, but even may bring about positive results in respect of the same problems, if applied vastly and properly.

Nevertheless, the outcome of voting was negative and the proposal was rejected. In spite of that, the very start of discussion in this regard can be considered a novel and useful step. It may hopefully open the door to further deliberation on measures of that type as an effective way for mitigating the effects of the aforesaid social costs.

As we said earlier, two other proposals were also put forward in the same session of the parliament. The first one demanded the case to be postponed for a period of one month. That proposal was also rejected. The last proposal which was approved finally reads:

"The government is required to arrange the working hours of banks in a way that they would start their work before the beginning of the work of government offices and organizations"

 

The End

 

*************************************************************************